“I knew there was a lot of pre-reading on this course – I think the course materials say about 15 hours’ worth of pre-reading. I thought, ‘Well, 15 hours. That’s three hours a day for five days. Easy.’ But it’s more than that. There is a lot of new terminology and there are new acronyms to learn. I think 30 hours is more realistic.
“It’s a five-day course. I was originally going to take the course in London in December but with the reading and the normal pre-Christmas rush, I just didn’t have time to travel down to London. So, I delayed it until May and instead opted for the Warwick location, which was a lot easier.
“I had already completed a lot of prep work for the December course but, when the course started, there was still a lot of content to get through. You squeeze a lot into four days and then the exam is on the fifth day. It was an intense course – I was up early every day and I was working every night. By Friday afternoon when we came to take the exam, I was pretty tired.
“The venue was great and the food brilliant – you need that when you are so busy. I prefer the classroom and being there physically with people, rather than online learning. It was a great benefit to me that you could talk to others, share stories and bounce ideas off each other.
“Unfortunately, I was just a couple of percentage points under the pass mark. That was disappointing. Looking back, I think I should have given myself the weekend to recover and asked to take it as a remote exam and to be invigilated remotely.
“There were two graduates taking the course and, as they had just finished university, you could see they were still in the academic ‘learning’ mode, rather than thinking about work. I was relying more on my real-world experience and, in hindsight, that was the wrong approach. I now know what I need to do when I retake the exam.”