Readers letters

Different operating requirements

PE

Mr Padgett queried reconciling manufacturing of Harrier continuously variable transmissions with disapproving of them for traction

In his letter of the July edition Mr Padgett queried reconciling manufacturing of Harrier continuously variable transmissions with disapproving of them for traction. The valid reason lies in the completely different operating requirements. With a jet engine the input speed is variable but the output has to be at a fixed (400 Hz) speed so there was no choice but to tolerate the weight and efficiency penalties of infinitely variable mechanical drive. In contrast, for standard traction, the output speed varies but the input Diesel is extremely flexible and stays efficient over a 3 to 1 speed range, so all the range needed can be supplied by a standard gearbox with the Diesel.

Nowadays the same problem arises with “renewable” energy if a varying speed turbine is to drive 50 Hz mains but with modern power electronics there is the solution of 3 phase generating followed by inverting.

Dr. J. D. Smith, Cambridge

Next letter: Flying the flag?

Share:

Professional Engineering magazine

Current Issue: Issue 1, 2025

Issue 1 2025 cover
  • AWE renews the nuclear arsenal
  • The engineers averting climate disaster
  • 5 materials transforming net zero
  • The hydrogen revolution

Read now

Professional Engineering app

  • Industry features and content
  • Engineering and Institution news
  • News and features exclusive to app users

Download our Professional Engineering app

Professional Engineering newsletter

A weekly round-up of the most popular and topical stories featured on our website, so you won't miss anything

Subscribe to Professional Engineering newsletter

Opt into your industry sector newsletter

Related articles