PE
What is needed to support the whole world’s population is development in “3rd world” countries
I was sorry that, despite its title, M. Keighley (Letters, PE February) uses the I.Mech.E. report, “Population: one planet, too many people?” to become neurotic about ‘overpopulation,’ quoting Malthus with “… population tends to increase at a greater rate that its means of subsistence.” I confess I have only skimmed the article and read its press report, but I would like to commend the very positive line taken regarding the technical interventions that can be made to allow for population growth.
Can I clarify a few things:
By contrast to M. Keighley’s, I commend the other letter on this in February’s PE, where Ian Watson takes a very pragmatic approach to world development. What is needed to support the whole world’s population is development in “3rd world” countries, where vast swathes of land have low or no productivity through unfair trade and lack of resources like simple irrigation schemes and other ‘intermediate technology.’ Support for these must become a much higher priority for our developed world, for the peace and welfare of everyone, if we are to minimise Mr. Keighley and Malthus’ fears.
Whatever, remember that “people” are the biggest resource we have.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Read now
Download our Professional Engineering app
A weekly round-up of the most popular and topical stories featured on our website, so you won't miss anything
Subscribe to Professional Engineering newsletter
Opt into your industry sector newsletter
Javascript Disabled
Please enable Javascript on your browser to view our news.